Monday, 6 June 2011
Glasman privileges a politics of collective action over a legal order of individual rights and this makes it hard for many left-liberals to fit him into the political spectrum. Furthermore, English political culture lacks a common vocabulary for talking about race, class and religion in political terms (our history is one of bitter struggle to de-politicise these) and Glasman has been insensitive to this cultural context. That is unfortunate because he and Blue Labour are trying to speak about things new Labour was embarrassed by: ethics, class and the British socialist tradition.
Glasman’s critique of the commodity does not originate with Polanyi, and it predates socialism. The critique of the commodity first appeared in the West as a critique of the idolatry of money; a critique of the belief that money can produce things of itself, and thus in particular a critique of usury (and it is worth noting that one of Glasman’s campaigns with London Citizens was for a cap on interest). That critique can be found in Aristotle (one of Glasman’s common reference points). Aristotle wrote of wealth creation that "The most hated sort and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself and not from the natural object of it”. This criticism overlaps with a religiously inspired critique of the belief that money can create something out of nothing (a power reserved only for divinity). Or, as Glasman puts it, “the pressure of commodification violates a fundamental notion of the sacred common to all the Abrahamic faiths concerning the integrity of the human being, the divine status of nature and the limits of money…”.
I reckon the Trots will soon re-classify the endangered toffs as a scheduled, ethno-cultural group. Let’s give em tax exempt schools and ensure their bizarre little beliefs (fox hunting, the British empire, Christianity, Kate Middleton) are granted official ‘respect.’ Hang on, it’s already happened!
‘Toffophobia watch’ to follow?
‘Toffophobia watch’ to follow?
Wednesday, 1 June 2011
Some general pointers - 'diversity' in the context of political correctness means the abolition of the nation state with it's unique ethnic/cultural identity and traditions, and it's replacement with something closely resembling an airport, where people from all over the world are jumbled together, each group having little in common with the other (often not even being able to communicate with one another). It means taking a step towards a managed global state, where the human race is reduced to cattle for the benefit of the elite.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)