I’m sorry you share the delusion that outsiders may call themselves English. Self-hating people care only for fashionable opinion as a rule, which means you probably use the terms English and ‘British’ interchangeably, and want for a proper sense of both. Allow me to help. I posted what follows to an English democracy site run by a former adviser to Tony Blair. It was used to invite comments on the ‘new English fascism’. I’m quite proud of that. Bear in mind my opinions are not necessarily those of Mr Henderson.


First ‘British’ is not an identity. It is a cloak of anonymity enemies reach for when trying to divert from English accomplishment. It is used to suggest burdens shared more or less equally throughout these islands, masking the damage inflicted on England and perpetuating the anonymity that allows it to continue. Is immigration really ‘British’, or an almost exclusively English curse ? You know the answer. Myself I couldn’t care less about ‘Britain’.


Nations are not the product of the political convenience they serve. Nations are special. The etymology of the word could not be less equivocal. Nations are peoples related by blood. Countries are not nations. Countries are geographical spaces occupied by nations. For a thousand years England, comparatively isolated from mainland Europe, enjoyed one of the most settled populations in the western hemisphere.


I am a nationalist. Since I am a nationalist, and in view of the meaning that properly attaches to the word ‘nation’, I believe nationalism without an explicitly racial component to be a waste of time. Racialism advocates separation. It has nothing to do with ‘hate’. It has nothing to do with ’supremacism’. It is far from something to be ashamed of. It merely asserts biology as the overwhelming determinant of human capacity, providing the surest means of preserving true human diversity.


I submit that racial identity is integral to national identity, that race and culture are indissolubly linked, that one is a by-product of the other. These two, indeed, ‘cannot be separated….(for) only the people who created a culture can sustain it. If immigration changes the face of America – and of Europe – nothing else will remain unchanged’ (McDaniel, G. & Taylor J., A Race Against Time, New Century Books 2004).


And since English culture is European culture and European culture necessarily white, racial awareness is nothing short of vital if the English, my people, are to survive.


It is by setting the borders at race that we protect who we are. If you are not white, you are not English. We should assert this with vigour, and for two reasons. First because it is true historically, and because the moral right of a people in their own homeland to define themselves in whatever way they see fit is no-one’s damned business but their own.

Second, and crucially, because biological egalitarianism, the notion that human differences show only superficial variation between individuals and groups, is a lie. It is a lie carefully cultivated by internationalist propaganda for reasons of political advantage. It is a lie nonetheless. The English are who they are, their culture is as it is, in large part because of biology. Defend biology and you defend the nation.


A Russian writer observed that a man with no racial sense is like a dog that never learns to bark. I hope you still have time. Better late than never.