Someone who's committed 15 previous offences without a custodial sentenced ever imposed, who then commits a 16th after coming out of prison is supposed to prove that prison doesn't work?

I reckon the Trots will soon re-classify the endangered toffs as a scheduled, ethno-cultural group. Let’s give em tax exempt schools and ensure their bizarre little beliefs (fox hunting, the British empire, Christianity, Kate Middleton) are granted official ‘respect.’ Hang on, it’s already happened!
‘Toffophobia watch’ to follow?

Some general pointers - 'diversity' in the context of political correctness means the abolition of the nation state with it's unique ethnic/cultural identity and traditions, and it's replacement with something closely resembling an airport, where people from all over the world are jumbled together, each group having little in common with the other (often not even being able to communicate with one another). It means taking a step towards a managed global state, where the human race is reduced to cattle for the benefit of the elite.

Human Rights law is actually based on existing English law, but it is easier to use because English rights, which grew up higgledy piggledy but are a world wonder, are like our Constitution - not written down on 10 sides of A4 or whatever.

In more complex cases, one might find that the accounts of ‘shared’ identity and values that emerge from such attempts at self-understanding are markedly diverse and highly contested, so that decisions then have to be made about which of these is to be adopted as the basis for evaluating the different kinds of capitalism at issue. As an example, consider what might be seen as the institutional transition from a coordinated to a liberal market economy in the UK during the 1980s. A notable feature of the political rhetoric supporting this transformation was the appeal to supposedly long-standing British values of individual enterprise, self-help and responsibility, to the ‘Victorian values’ from which the nation had been led astray during the post-WW2 period of welfare dependency and collectivism. In response, however, critics argued that ‘Victorian values’ would better be interpreted as those underlying the provision of public goods, the rise of mutual societies and the growth of professionalism, and that the post-WW2 welfare state expressed a deeply rooted sense of social solidarity

For example, it never occurs to the conservative that there is any doubt that he owns the property he has bought and paid for, or that he isn't free to marry and found a family, or bring up his children as he wishes. These are absolute things, which existed before there ever was a state, and the state shouldn't encroach on them. It should also defend them against outside threats, or it has no 'right' or rather reason, to exist.

But the liberal libertarian ( who is in fact a power-worshipper who thinks the state is the embodiment of his own human goodness) wants there to be a 'right' , issued by the state, to private property , to marry, to found a family. He also often speaks of a bizarre thing called a 'right to life' which is mainly an excuse to ban the death penalty for murderers, and certainly doesn't save unborn babies from selfish abortions.

‘trendy, bohemian and posh’ Kelvinbridge area of Glasgow voted ‘Yes’ to AV (and in this respect it was similar to the other places across the UK which voted ‘Yes’ too).

So it strikes me that a full set of AV Referendum results could serve as a useful map for identifying every single Eddie Izzard-style , gentrified former working-class area in Britain which now contains a majority of middle-class, Banksy-loving c**ts who’ve successfully ousted the original inhabitants (mercifully still quite small in number it appears).

If it could, then all the cash wasted to indulge the Lib Dem’s pathetic vanity project has turned out to be money well worth after all, I’d say.